GREEN Crypto Coin Explained: What Is the GREEN (GRE) Token?
Jul, 22 2025
Green Crypto Score Calculator
Evaluate a Green Crypto Project
Based on industry standards for genuine sustainability claims, calculate a sustainability score for any green crypto project. This tool uses criteria from the Crypto Climate Accord and industry best practices.
Sustainability Score Result
Project Name:
How Your Project Compares
| Project | Score | Category |
|---|---|---|
| Hedera | 92 | Green Leader |
| Cardano | 87 | Green Leader |
| Ethereum | 82 | Green Leader |
| GREEN (GRE) | 24 | Unverified |
What This Means
According to industry standards, projects with scores above 75 are considered credible green crypto projects. Scores between 50-74 are questionable, and scores below 50 should be considered high-risk with unverified claims.
Based on the article content, the GREEN token scored 24, which matches its actual standing in the market and the concerns raised about its sustainability claims.
Quick Takeaways
- GREEN crypto claims to be an eco‑friendly digital asset but offers almost no technical transparency.
- Price on Oct 23 2025: $0.00027249 USD, with a 24‑hour drop of ‑98.11%.
- Total supply ~4.01 billion GRE; circulating supply figures are contradictory.
- No public whitepaper, audit, or energy‑usage data - a red flag for sustainability claims.
- Compared with established green projects (Ethereum, Cardano, Hedera) it falls far short on verification, developer support, and market presence.
What Is GREEN (GRE)?
When you see GREEN (GRE) described as a “green cryptocurrency,” the first question should be: what exactly does it do?
According to the project’s own site (grcoin.com), GREEN is meant to be a standalone blockchain whose sole mission is to reduce the environmental impact of crypto mining. The token ticker is GRE. In practice, however, the ecosystem around the coin is almost invisible - there are no public roadmaps, no GitHub repo, and no documented consensus algorithm.
Tokenomics and Supply Details
The most concrete numbers we have come from CoinMarketCap on the day of writing:
- Total supply: 4,013,528,640.89 GRE
- Reported circulating supply: 3,114,247,449.66613 GRE (CoinMarketCap lists 0 GRE in its UI, a clear data error).
- Market cap (calculated from the price above): roughly $850,000 USD.
This tiny market cap, combined with the 98 % price plunge in a single day, suggests a liquidity nightmare. Without listings on major exchanges, traders can only move the token on a handful of low‑volume Korean platforms.
Technical Foundations - What We Know (and don’t know)
Most reputable green blockchains publish clear technical specs: proof‑of‑stake ratios, transaction‑per‑second (TPS) benchmarks, and energy‑per‑transaction figures. GREEN provides none of that.
What we can infer:
- It runs on its own blockchain rather than as an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum.
- No whitepaper is publicly available, so the consensus method (PoS, PoA, or something else) is unknown.
- No third‑party audit has been released, and no open‑source code repository exists.
In contrast, Ethereum announced its “Merge” in 2022, cutting energy use by 99.95 % to about 0.0026 kWh per transaction. Cardano publishes live statistics on its explorer, and Hedera reports 0.00017 kWh per transaction with carbon‑negative certification. GREEN simply does not provide any comparable data.
Environmental Claims - Fact or Fiction?
The token’s marketing blurb repeatedly mentions “eco‑friendly” and “sustainable mining,” yet there is no verifiable metric. Projects such as Algorand share real‑time carbon footprints through ClimateTrade, and the Crypto Climate Accord tracks participants’ renewable‑energy usage. GREEN is absent from those registries.
Without a published energy‑consumption model, investors cannot judge whether the coin truly reduces emissions or merely rides on the green buzz.
Market Position and Liquidity
On Oct 23 2025, CoinMarketCap ranked GREEN at #402 by market cap. For perspective, the top eco‑focused chains sit much higher:
- Cardano - #7, market cap $14.2 B.
- Solana - #5, market cap $83.5 B (energy use ≈0.00025 kWh/tx).
- Hedera - #34, market cap $4.7 B, carbon‑negative.
The stark difference illustrates why institutional investors are steering clear of GREEN. The lack of exchange listings, wallet support, and developer tools makes it practically unusable for everyday transactions.
Comparison with Established Green Coins
| Metric | GREEN (GRE) | Ethereum (post‑Merge) | Cardano | Hedera |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus | Undisclosed | Proof‑of‑Stake | Proof‑of‑Stake | Hashgraph (BFT) |
| Energy per Tx | Not published | 0.0026 kWh | ~0.0005 kWh | 0.00017 kWh |
| Market Cap (Oct 2025) | ≈$0.85 M | $20.4 B | $14.2 B | $4.7 B |
| Exchange Listings | 2 low‑volume Korean sites | All major exchanges | Major exchanges + DeFi | Major exchanges + enterprise partners |
| Third‑Party Audits | None reported | Multiple audits (e.g., ConsenSys Diligence) | Multiple audits | Independent carbon‑negative certification |
The table makes it clear: GREEN lacks the data, infrastructure, and market depth that genuinely sustainable projects provide.
Red Flags and Investor Risks
When evaluating any crypto, look for three core pillars: transparency, utility, and community. GREEN scores poorly on all three.
- Transparency: No verifiable whitepaper, no GitHub, contradictory supply numbers.
- Utility: No documented smart‑contract platform, no active wallets, limited exchange liquidity.
- Community: No official Telegram, Discord, or Reddit presence; sparse user reviews (average 1.8/5 on CoinMarketCap).
Regulators are increasingly scrutinizing green‑washing in crypto. The EU’s MiCA framework now requires documented carbon‑offset strategies for ESG claims. GREEN is not listed in any compliance registry, making it a likely target for future regulatory action.
How to Vet Green Crypto Projects (A Mini‑Guide)
- Check for an independent audit (e.g., CertiK, Quantstamp).
- Look for published energy‑per‑transaction data.
- Verify participation in standards bodies like the Crypto Climate Accord.
- Confirm active developer repos and community channels.
- Assess exchange listings and liquidity depth.
Applying this checklist to GREEN quickly reveals why many experts label it a high‑risk, low‑credibility asset.
Bottom Line - Should You Invest?
If you’re hunting for a truly sustainable crypto, the answer is a firm “no.” The token’s opaque technology, missing sustainability metrics, and near‑zero market cap make it unsuitable for both retail and institutional portfolios. Focus on projects that openly share their carbon‑footprint dashboards and have third‑party verification.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the GREEN (GRE) ticker stand for?
GRE is the short symbol used on the few exchanges that list the token. It does not correspond to a longer official name beyond the project’s branding as “GREEN.”
Is GREEN really a green (environmentally friendly) blockchain?
No verifiable data exists to prove that GREEN reduces energy consumption. Without published metrics or third‑party certification, the claim remains unsubstantiated.
Where can I buy or trade GREEN?
At the time of writing, GREEN is only listed on two low‑volume Korean exchanges. No major exchange (Binance, Coinbase, Kraken) supports it.
How does GREEN's market cap compare to other eco‑coins?
GREEN’s market cap is under $1 million, whereas leading green projects like Cardano, Solana, and Hedera each hold multi‑billion‑dollar market caps.
What red flags should I watch for with GREEN?
Key warnings include absent whitepaper, contradictory supply data, no audit, lack of community channels, and extreme price volatility.
